|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple Means of Recognition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous/Next Navigation for Collections
Multiple Means of Recognition
In the example above, Sylvia's dilemma shows the limitation of a single representation
of the information for any particular task or problem. To provide basic access
for some students (e.g. deficient in one modality or another, such as in dyslexia),
and multiple routes to meaning for all students (e.g. representing a math concept
both in text and graphically), multiple representations of meaning should be
provided. During assessment, unless we are testing students' ability to use
a particular modality (e.g. specifically testing their ability to read text),
multiple representations will help ensure that they are provided the best opportunity
to demonstrate their skills and knowledge. For example, if we are assessing
students' understanding of principles of mathematic probability, representing
the questions both as word problems and graphically may better align the test
with the learning goals and make it more broadly equitable to students.
Page updated April 11, 2003
Previous/Next Navigation for Collections

© 1999-2009 CAST,
40 Harvard Mills Square, Foundry Street,
Wakefield, MA 01880-3233,
USA.
Telephone: +1 (781) 245-2212
Email:
cast@cast.org
|