|
|
|
Previous/Next Navigation for Collections
Text to Speech
Prepared by Roxanne Ruzic and Kathy O'Connell
Text to speech is any process or product in which a student is exposed to printed text while hearing it read aloud.
For this study, text-to-speech refers to the reading of text from a computer screen using synthesized (computer-generated)
speech or digital (human-recorded) speech.
Evidence of effectiveness
Only a limited number of research studies have been published on the use of text to speech in classrooms (we identified five, two of which reviewed multiple studies). Those studies we did locate that found text to speech to be effective (four of the five) examined its use exclusively in computer labs or special education classrooms by individual students with reading disabilities. The one study that looked at a typical population of students using text to speech in writing tasks found mixed results. Almost all studies reviewed examined the use of text to speech for reading (as opposed to other content areas such as social studies and science).
While involving students from limited populations, the studies we reviewed examined the use of text to speech by students across all grade levels.
A couple of the studies included in this review have significant methodological drawbacks, such as extremely small sample sizes (three or four students total in a given sample). While three of the studies were multiple study reviews, the small number of studies and the limited populations, content areas, and locations of use evaluated make any conclusions about the usefulness of text to speech from a research perspective extremely preliminary. We have no evidence of the effectiveness of text to speech with any populations in a general education classroom.
While this research evidence does not indicate how text to speech might be used in a heterogeneous general education classroom, it is possible that text to speech shows promise in helping students with reading disabilities comprehend written materials.
Text to Speech Data Tables
To download documents:
- Windows users: Right click the link to the document and choose Save Target As... from the popup menu.
- Mac users: Control-click the link to the document and choose Download Link to Disk from the popup menu.
|
PDF:
In order to download or print PDF versions of documents,
you need to have Acrobat Reader installed. If you don't have
Acrobat Reader installed, download the Acrobat Installer
from Adobe's Acrobat web page and then install the Acrobat
Reader before continuing.
|
Text to Speech References
Borgh, K., & Dickson, W. P. (1992). The effects on children's writing of adding speech
synthesis to a word processor.
Journal of Research in Computing in Education, 24(4), 533-544.
Dawson, L., Venn, M. L., & Gunter, P. L. (2000). The effects of teacher versus computer
reading models.
Behavioral Disorders, 25(2), 105-113.
Farmer, M. E., Klein, R., & Bryson, S. E. (1992). Computer-assisted reading: Effects of
whole-word feedback on fluency and comprehension in readers with severe disabilities.
Remedial & Special Education, 13(2), 50-60.
Hebert, B. M., & Murdock, J. Y. (1994). Comparing three computer-aided instruction
output modes to teach vocabulary words to students with learning disabilities.
Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9(3), 136-141.
McCullough, C. S. (1995). Using computer technology to monitor student progress and
remediate reading problems. School Psychology Review, 24(3), 426-439.
Page updated August 13, 2001
Previous/Next Navigation for Collections

© 1999-2009 CAST,
40 Harvard Mills Square, Foundry Street,
Wakefield, MA 01880-3233,
USA.
Telephone: +1 (781) 245-2212
Email:
cast@cast.org
This Web Site was developed pursuant to cooperative agreement #H324H990004
under CFDA 84.324H between CAST and the Office of Special Education
Programs, U.S. Department of Education. However, the opinions expressed
herein do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the U.S.
Department of Education or the Office of Special Education Programs and no
endorsement by that office should be inferred.
|