[Follow this link to go to content] | CAST: Center for Applied Special Technology     National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum [Text version]
 
  NCAC Site Map | Take Notes | Provide Feedback | Change Interface | Get Language Help  
   

You are here: NCAC: Research & Solutions: Curriculum: Teacher Survey

NCAC Curriculum Teacher Survey

Conducted by Roxanne Ruzic and Kathy O'Connell

Goals

Close up of hands, open workbook and apple.
d
We surveyed a convenience sample of teachers, primarily from the greater Boston area, to find out:

  • What curriculum adaptations and enhancements teachers make in their classrooms to accommodate different learners.
  • What curriculum adaptations and enhancements provided by publishers teachers use to accommodate different learners.
  • What curriculum adaptations or enhancements teachers would make to their curriculum if they had more resources.

We were interested in comparing teachers' perspectives on effective curriculum related practices to the perspectives of publishers and researchers on this topic. Because the greater Boston area historically has had a strong educational research community and a strong educational publishing presence, we hypothesized that teachers in this region should be as connected or more connected to the perspectives of these other groups as in other communities.

Sample

The sample included 58 teachers. All but two were from Massachusetts, and the majority of the teachers were female. Most were general (as opposed to special) educators and most worked in suburban schools. Teaching experience in the sample ranged from one to 37 years. Teachers from all grade levels (kindergarten to twelfth grade) were represented. Teachers in the sample at the secondary level taught a variety of subjects.

Methods

We distributed paper surveys to teachers across a variety of districts, schools, and grade levels, in both urban and suburban communities at two different times. The teachers were asked to return to surveys in sealed envelopes (to protect confidentiality) to a local school representative connected with the project, or to mail them back in stamped, addressed envelopes.

In the survey, teachers were asked to list the curriculum adaptations they use, the curriculum adaptations publishers provide that they use, and the curriculum adaptations they would use if they had more resources or that would be most helpful to them. Based on feedback, we simplified the survey for the second distribution.

Findings

Teachers reported that they generally customize or adapt curriculum for between 6% and 100% of their students. Six teachers of the 51 who responded to this question reported they customize material for all their students. Most commonly, teachers reported they customize materials for between 15% and 30% of their students.

Of the 58 teachers who returned the surveys, only 22 reported that they used materials provided by publishers to accommodate different learners in their classrooms.

A comparison of the adaptations that were

  1. reported used by teachers in the sample,
  2. supplied by publishers and used by teachers in the sample and
  3. would be used by teachers if they had more resources
comprises Table 1, below. (Five teachers also reported they would benefit from more books, more non-fiction books, or more trade books tied to the curriculum.)

Table 1: A comparison of enhancements and adaptations used and requested by teachers in the sample (total sample size = 58 teachers)
Enhancement/adaptation # teachers who reported use # teachers who used from publishers # teachers who would use if had more resources
Simplified concepts, instructions 13 0 0
Hands on activities/manipulatives 12 3 7
Visual representations of content 12 5 4
Technology (software and/or hardware, including Internet) 12 4 19
Leveled materials 11 3 13
Aural representations of content (books or materials on audio tape) 10 2 5
Summaries/review sheets/study guides 9 1 0
Simplified or enlarged visual layout 9 0 1
Enrichment/extensions/supplemental materials 7 8 1
Multiple representations of content (same content materials presented in visual, text, graphic, aural, and/or hands-on formats) 7 1 0
Different/individualized assessments on same topic 6 0 1
Advance or graphic organizers 6 2 0
Examples/models/demos 4 2 0
Simulations/role plays/games 4 0 2
Color 3 0 0
Choice of activities on same topic 3 0 1
Materials that appeal to multicultural audiences or address diversity 2 0 1
Materials for students learning English 1 0 1
Tips/guidelines for instruction 0 4 0
Activity-based instruction 0 1 0
Materials with connections to the outside or real world 0 0 5
More practice activities/consumables 0 0 2

Note that the enhancements used by teachers and the enhancements that would be used by teachers if they had more resources do not seem to parallel materials that teachers perceive as being available from publishers. While this survey was conducted with a limited sample, the results suggest that teachers and publishers may benefit from increased communication.

Page updated May 07, 2001

Bobby Approved

© 1999-2009 CAST, 40 Harvard Mills Square, Foundry Street, Wakefield, MA 01880-3233, USA. Telephone: +1 (781) 245-2212
Email: cast@cast.org


This Web Site was developed pursuant to cooperative agreement #H324H990004 under CFDA 84.324H between CAST and the Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education. However, the opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the U.S. Department of Education or the Office of Special Education Programs and no endorsement by that office should be inferred.